$30M Mesothelioma Win Against Bridgestone Firestone Sparks Hope

Think about a fight where the opponent is invisible, yet the consequences are terrible and usually lethal. This is the reality for individuals with mesothelioma, a rare but malignant cancer that is primarily caused by asbestos exposure. 

Mesothelioma has grown into an alarming health concern owing to the application of asbestos in businesses during the last century. Asbestos, once praised for its heat resistance and toughness, has left a lethal legacy. 

According to the WHO, around 125 million people worldwide are subjected to asbestos in their places of work. Over a million deaths per year occur due to asbestos-related diseases. 

Despite a nationwide asbestos prohibition finally sealed in early 2024, the problem is to linger for much longer. Recently, an Illinois jury delivered a historic $30 million conviction against Bridgestone Firestone. The scenario inspired thousands of these asbestos-exposure victims to continue to seek justice.

The Persistent Problem of Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos is a fibrous substance that was once widely employed in construction, according to TorHoerman Law. The element is also used in the automobile and manufacturing industries. 

When breathed, its fibers can lodge in the lungs, belly, or heart, producing inflammation and then mesothelioma, reports the NCI. Asbestos is tightly restricted and prohibited in many nations, including the US. However, the chemical remains in older buildings, goods, and industrial facilities.

Mesothelioma has a long latency period. Symptoms may not develop for up to 4 decades after initial exposure, according to a study published in 2022. The ensuing wait makes it challenging to identify the origin of exposure and hold those responsible accountable. 

Despite restrictions and bans, contact with asbestos remains a significant concern. Many older structures and goods still contain hazardous materials. Additionally, several sectors continue to utilize asbestos, whether legally or illegally. Hence, its use endangers workers and the general public, reports the Mesothelioma Center.

The Complexity of Asbestos Lawsuits

Victims of asbestos-induced mesothelioma have no option but to resort to the legal system for recompense for their suffering. Asbestos lawsuits seek to hold companies, employers, and other accountable parties responsible for knowingly exposing people to this hazardous substance. 

These lawsuits can be complicated and lengthy. It may require documentation and expert testimony to establish a connection between asbestos exposure and disease.

A Closer Look at the Illinois Jury’s Recent Verdict Against Bridgestone Firestone 

Among the most notable recent advances in asbestos litigation has been the $30 million ruling against Bridgestone Firestone. This case has become a source of encouragement to numerous mesothelioma patients who continue to strive for justice.

In this critical verdict, an Illinois jury granted $30 million to the surviving members of a deceased mesothelioma sufferer. They had been in contact with asbestos while working at Bridgestone Firestone. 

The lawsuit claimed that the corporation knew about the potential hazards of asbestos. Yet, the entity did not take appropriate precautions to safeguard its employees. They consciously exposed Bridgestone Firestone’s laxity in protecting worker safety.

The trial featured substantial testimony from medical professionals, past workers, and industrial hygienists. The evidence presented demonstrated that Bridgestone Firestone employed asbestos-containing supplies in its production procedures. 

Eventually, this practice exposed workers to the dangerous fibers. The jury found the firm accountable for the patient’s illness and subsequent demise. As a result, the entire scene resulted in a significant $30 million verdict, as reported by IANS.

A Sliver of Hope for Mesothelioma Patients

The precedent the Bridgestone Firestone case set is just as important as the monetary settlement that came with it. To get settlements, many mesothelioma patients who filed asbestos lawsuits have to deal with delays and deceptive tactics from defendants. Companies often use legal maneuvers to avoid liability, as highlighted in a 2023 Bloomberg Law report.  Hence, it exacerbates the pain of victims and their families.

This massive $30 million verdict is a reminder to businesses of the costs of carelessness and the value of accountability. It also shows that it is possible to prevail against big corporations. Also, the news gives hope to the many mesothelioma patients who are still fighting for justice.

FAQs

Do I need a specialized lawyer for an asbestos lawsuit?

It is highly recommended that you hire an asbestos litigation lawyer. They are adept at navigating the nuances of asbestos law, including identifying liable parties, collecting compelling evidence, and pursuing verdicts. Their expertise increases the chances of securing adequate compensation for damages caused by asbestos exposure.

What if the company that caused my asbestos exposure is no longer in business?

Even if a company goes bankrupt, victims can file claims through asbestos trust funds explicitly established for such cases. These funds were set up expressly to compensate affected individuals. Also, if the company at fault undergoes restructuring or ceases operation, there is still a way to seek compensation. 

Are asbestos litigation settlements taxable?

In general, compensation from mesothelioma settlements for diseases or physical injuries is not taxed. Taxes, however, might apply to any interest received on the settlement sum. Any punitive damages awarded, which are intended to punish the defendant rather than compensate the victim, are also taxable.

Can several people file a joint asbestos lawsuit? 

Yes, a class-action lawsuit may be filed by several people who were exposed to asbestos in the same place. This can split the cost of litigation and expedite the legal process. However, in more recent times, class action lawsuits for asbestos exposure have become less common. Courts often find that asbestos-related cases are too unique in terms of each plaintiff’s exposure history and medical condition.

The verdict against Bridgestone Firestone represents a significant victory for mesothelioma patients and their families. It emphasizes the ongoing issue of asbestos exposure and the importance of remaining vigilant and accountable. The battle against mesothelioma is far from being resolved. However, this landmark case provides hope and a reminder that justice can be served.